TOOL № 063 / TEXT TOOLS / RUNS IN YOUR BROWSER — NOTHING UPLOADED

Cover Letter Generator

Builds a properly formatted first draft from your own specific achievements and reasons for applying — not generic filler.

This produces a first draft, not a finished letter. Most hiring managers can now spot a generic, unedited AI-assisted cover letter, and a growing number say it actively counts against a candidate. Every fact in this draft comes from what you typed in — nothing here invents an achievement or a reason to like the company on your behalf — but you should still read it aloud, personalise anything that doesn't sound like you, and add detail a template has no way to know. The more of this you make genuinely yours, the better it works.
Write a real, complete sentence — something that would stop making sense if you swapped in a different company's name.

Your strongest relevant achievement

In the print dialog: set Scale to 100% / Actual size; the page margin is set from a standard 20mm, so leave the dialog's own margin at Default.

About this cover letter generator

Recruiters increasingly report the same complaint about AI-assisted cover letters: they all sound like the same polite, slightly hollow paragraph, whoever wrote them and whatever job they're for. The tell isn't the writing quality — it's that nothing in the letter is actually specific. If you could swap the company name and the letter still makes sense, it was never really about that company at all, and experienced hiring managers notice within seconds.

This tool is built around that specific failure mode. It does not generate a reason you'd want to work somewhere, or invent an achievement to make you look good — every fact-bearing sentence in the finished draft is something you typed in yourself. What it handles is the structure and the tone: a properly formatted business letter, phrased consistently, built around your own specifics rather than a generic template with your name dropped in.

The "why this company" line matters more than it looks like it should. A sentence that would still make sense if you swapped in a different employer's name is exactly the kind of generic filler hiring managers say they can spot immediately. The three-part achievement — what the situation was, what you actually did, and what happened as a result — is the STAR method career advisors recommend for the same reason: specific, ideally with a real number, beats "results-driven team player" every time.

Modern cover letters also run shorter than they used to — current guidance points to roughly 250 to 400 words, not the old three-paragraph format, so this draft is built to be concise rather than exhaustive. Choose a tone — formal, warm, or confident — for how the connective sentences around your facts are phrased; none of the tones use stock phrases like "I am excited to apply" or "passionate team player", since those are exactly the lines that make a letter sound interchangeable.

Read the finished draft aloud before you send it. If a sentence doesn't sound like you, change it — that's the whole point of starting from a draft rather than a blank page. Everything you type is generated in your browser and saved locally so you can come back to it; nothing is uploaded anywhere.

Frequently asked questions

Is it safe to submit this as my final cover letter?

Read it over and personalise it first. A growing share of hiring managers say they can identify generic AI-assisted letters and hold it against the candidate — the safest use of this tool is as a properly structured starting point you then make genuinely your own, not a finished submission.

What makes a good answer for "why this company"?

Something specific enough that it would stop making sense for a different employer — a product decision, a piece of writing from their team, a specific initiative, not "your great culture" or "your mission." One genuine, specific reason beats several vague ones.

What if I don't have a number for my result?

A concrete outcome still works without one — "the process is still in use across the team" or "we shipped two weeks ahead of the original date" are specific even without a percentage. Vague ("things went well") is what to avoid, not the absence of a number specifically.

Should I address a specific hiring manager or "Hiring Team"?

A named person if you can find one from the job posting or company site; "Hiring Team" if you genuinely cannot. Avoid "To Whom It May Concern" — it reads as dated and impersonal to most current hiring managers.

Does this work for career changes or first jobs?

Yes — the achievement does not have to be from a paid job. A project, volunteer role, or significant personal undertaking works the same way in the Situation/Action/Result structure, as long as it is specific and genuinely relevant to the role.